| |
Tommie, don't hector.
| Re: Re: Re: U.S.A : Wars-R-Us
by d.-
on 2003-01-17 13:55:09
|
Reply to this
|
| |
exactly. Someone ASSUMED there was non-participation!!!
| Re: Re: Re: Re: U.S.A : Wars-R-Us
by T.V.O.R
on 2003-01-22 01:05:55
|
Reply to this
|
| |
d. you should read the daily mirror(uk)
| Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: U.S.A : Wars-R-Us
by T.VO.R.
on 2003-01-22 16:39:03
|
Reply to this
|
| |
Bust has totaly lost it,now he's saying that if Iraq's troops follow orders and shoot at US troops,they will be considered as war criminals.According to international law they are P.O.Ws NOT war criminals.Bush is making it up as he goes along.You can not just make up laws ad hock other wise we might all start making up laws!
|
| Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: U.S.A : Wars-R-Us
by T.VO.R.
on 2003-01-22 16:39:04
|
Reply to this
|
| |
Bust has totaly lost it,now he's saying that if Iraq's troops follow orders and shoot at US troops,they will be considered as war criminals.According to international law they are P.O.Ws NOT war criminals.Bush is making it up as he goes along.You can not just make up laws ad hock other wise we might all start making up laws!
| Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: U.S.A : Wars-R-Us
by T.V.O.R
on 2003-01-23 15:14:42
|
Reply to this
|
| |
Was I hearing things,or did Bush say the words "bad movie?"
| Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: U.S.A : Wars-R-Us
by T.V.O.R
on 2003-01-23 15:20:09
|
Reply to this
|
| |
www.onion.com Good website.
| Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: U.S.A : Wars-R-Us
by Wash!
on 2003-01-24 03:33:11
|
Reply to this
|
| |
How much of a loser do you have to be to enter random vegatables followed by .com in hope of finding a cool website?? I mean how dumb!!!!! OK, I admit it: that's how we stumbled accross PDC. SO now I ask you: How much of a loser do you have to be not to be able to spell potato correctly?? I mean how dumb!!!! (for the record, it wasnt me!! Try www.dot.com though!
| Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: U.S.A : Wars-R-Us
by T.V,OR
on 2003-01-24 09:49:13
|
Reply to this
|
| |
Dear frend. I see you are still bitter and twisted about the "shamelass wanker" remark, it is what I would term A GOOD NATURED INSULT, not an actual insult. I'ill have a look at www.dot.com. Peace.
| Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: U.S.A : Wars-R-Us
by Wash!
on 2003-01-25 15:25:59
|
Reply to this
|
| |
Dear Voice, what the hell are you talkng about????? I dont remember you calling me a shamelAss wanker, but thanks for bringing it to my attention. Www.dot.com isn't what it used to be at the time of searching weird named websites. And do you really beleive my name is "Wash Potato" Ok, Peace, but i don't even remember replying to one of your messages. Anyway, where abouts in London are you from and how long have you lived there. Coz I have family there, and I wanna know how much of a cockney you are? A+
|
| Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: U.S.A : Wars-R-Us
by Wash!
on 2003-01-25 15:44:35
|
Reply to this
|
| |
PS: While I still retain the "Peace" thing, i think "Voice of Opinion" would be a more suitable name! No-one can say they are "right" on a "discussion" board, no? No offence meant at all, but if i am a shamelass wanker, then you have to recognise that all said on this site is "opinion"!!!! Voila.
| Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: U.S.A : Wars-R-Us
by T.V.O.R
on 2003-01-25 17:40:50
|
Reply to this
|
| |
Wash, calm down.your taking this all too seriously. The term "shameless wanker" was a joke in respones to one of your entries,just a joke! Please accept my apology if I've offended you. My name "The voice of reason" is also a bit of a joke as I got it from the title of a religious weekly magazine. I think of myself as a londoner.I not sure what a Cockney is surpose to be nowdays.Don't you think the name Wash potato was also meant to be a joke, it made me smile.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: U.S.A : Wars-R-Us
by d.-
on 2003-01-24 15:17:39
|
Reply to this
|
| |
you are: the "Voice" inside my head. Thanks for the recommendation on the "Daily"... (are you also a Brit? -- like so many of the Taters here?) F.Y.I. And you should check out the Times of London (Jan. 15th, '003) and find John LeCarre's most
excellent commentary entitled: The United States of America has Gone Mad -- it's long, but I feel it's onthemoney!
| Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: U.S.A : Wars-R-Us
by T.V.O.R
on 2003-01-25 15:07:36
|
Reply to this
|
| |
Hi d, I've just read the full text of John LeCarre's essay "The United States Of America Has Gone Mad" in The Times(UK). I was impressed by his writing,it was eloquent and precise and avoided all the usual cliches and platitudes spoken on the subject.P.S I am from the fair city of London,no one here calls themselves Brits, I think its an Amercian thing.
| Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: U.S.A : Wars-R-Us
by d.-
on 2003-01-26 14:47:29
|
Reply to this
|
| |
dear 'voice' inside my head... I just received another
e-mail for peace from a friend -- to paraphrase one quote in the article from Mother Teresa found her saying that she would not join an "anti-war" demonstration, yet she would join a "pro-peace" rally. There is a difference, yes?
Gotta go -- "London's calling..."
|
| Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: U.S.A : Wars-R-Us
by d.-
on 2003-01-26 15:07:36
|
Reply to this
|
| |
oh -- was there anything in particular you wanted me to read in the Daily???
| Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: U.S.A : Wars-R-Us
by T.V.O.R
on 2003-01-26 16:26:15
|
Reply to this
|
| |
Hi d, no,nothing in particular,I just admire the Mirror's unexpected stance in being out and out against the war. Spookily in your entry you said "London's cslling" which is a song by The Clash and the first record I ever bought.P.S whats papers do you read.
| Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: U.S.A : Wars-R-Us
by d.-
on 2003-01-27 14:57:31
|
Reply to this
|
| |
Hello... I don't get the spooky entry part -- I was just
hearing that one lyric in my head as I was writing to you (in London) -- so I guess you ARE the 'voice' inside my head! Oh -- if the term 'Brit' is considered slang and/or derogatory in any way, all apologies. I guess what I'm wondering what the generic catch-all term is for ALL people from England? If one is NOT from London, then how is
one called? Are you all Englanders then?? Thanks for the
communiques....
| Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: U.S.A : Wars-R-Us
by T.V.O.R
on 2003-01-27 16:05:02
|
Reply to this
|
| |
Hi d, Iam sorry if I sounded a bit offish about the Brit thing,I don't mean to. You can call me anything you like. In fact Brit will do just do just great. When I said "spookily" I just meant it was a coincidence that you mentioned the lyric of a song I like, I didn't mean it to sound like an X-file moment. Communiques!....now your making fun of me.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
